|
How Two Major
Gambling Proposals Were Defeated in California on Nov. 2,
2004
By: California Coalition Against Gambling Expansion
California rjects gambling expansion
Background: On March 8, 2004, the Board of Directors
of the California Council on Alcohol Problems (CAP) spent
several hours discussing proposals to expand gambling in California.
Fred Jones, CAP's attorney, led the group through printed
copies of two proposed initiatives. Five major racetracks
and 11 major card clubs had submitted a 17-page petition,
that later became Proposition 68. The Agua Caliente Tribe
of Palm Springs had submitted a seven-page petition that became
Proposition 70. After serious discussion and prayer, the CAP
Board, which also serves as the Board of the California Coalition
Against Gambling Expansion (CAGE), voted to oppose both initiatives
and to mount a campaign for their defeat.
The ultimate purpose of Prop 68 was to legalize 30,000 slot
machines in the 5 racetracks and 11 card clubs. Government
was to receive 33% of these slot machine proceeds. Legalizing
slot machines for the tracks and card clubs was the ultimate
purpose of Prop 68. The publicized rationale for Prop 68 was
to require all Indian casinos to share 25% of their profits
with the State. It was obvious from the beginning that no
one believed that the Indian casinos would give 25% of all
their profits to California forever.
"Fair Share" became the rallying cry. Governor Schwarzenegger
had campaigned on the promise of getting a fair share of casino
profits for the State. Many citizens favored casinos helping
to pay for roads, traffic congestion, law enforcement, zoning
requirements, water controls, environmental concerns, etc.
Prop 70 provided that a "fair share" of casino profits
would be the normal corporation tax (8.8%) that is paid by
all California businesses. Prop 70 also provided that Tribes
could operate an unlimited number of casinos on their trust
lands, could offer all types of gambling devices, and replace
their two-year compacts with 99-year agreements.
The Campaign: Both initiatives constituted a massive expansion
of gambling in California. CAP/CAGE prepared position papers
against both Initiatives. Our facts emphasized the adverse
impact that increased gambling would have on the economy,
but also mentioned the social costs: addictions, embezzlements,
bankruptcies, marital disputes, divorces, suicides and crime.
A packet of materials was sent to 9500 California churches
and more than 1,000 friends of CAP/CAGE. CAP's materials were
widely distributed in congregations, in neighborhoods, and
among personal friends. Our materials were shared with the
media and were included in editorials, TV and radio programs,
in letters to the editor, etc. Harvey Chinn, the Director
of CAP/CAGE, appeared with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
at a press conference in Sacramento on Oct. 19, which focused
on defeating Props 68 and 70. Most of the state's newspapers
editorialized against both initiatives. Labor unions, environmental
groups, the California Chamber of Commerce and many other
groups opposed both propositions.
The tribes spent $30,600,000 in their efforts to pass Prop
70. The racetrack and card club owners invested $27,000,000
to convince voters to enact Prop 68. Two weeks before the
election, the tracks and card clubs discovered that their
efforts were turning voters against more gambling. They ended
their advertising campaign. The Tribes, however, actually
increased their campaigning.
Decisive Rejection: Only 16% of the population voted to put
slots machines in racetracks and card clubs. An overwhelming
84% voted "NO" on Prop 68. By a 76% "NO"
vote, Californians also turned down the tribes' efforts to
expand casino gambling. Only 24% voted for the tribes - a
remarkable contrast to the huge ballot victories the Indians
won in 1998 and 2000.
Proposition 68 results: YES: 1,535,303 (16%); NO: 7,871,244
(84%).
Proposition 70 results: YES: 2,256,801 (24.%); NO: 7,114,708
(76%).
"The people have spoken - no more casinos"
- Headline in the San Francisco Chronicle - Nov. 17, 2004
California Coalition Against Gambling
Expansion
803 Vallejo Way, Sacramento, CA 95818 (916) 441-1844
|
|
Proposition
68&70 Campaign of 2004
|
|